top of page

Supreme Court Ruling Empowers Freight Carriers in Regulatory Challenges

Supreme Court Ruling Empowers Freight Carriers in Regulatory Challenges



Supreme Court

Freight carriers may find themselves in a stronger position to contest regulations following a pivotal U.S. Supreme Court decision. On Friday, the court ruled 6-3 to overturn the Chevron doctrine, a long-standing policy that required courts to defer to federal agencies' interpretations of ambiguous laws.


End of a 40-Year Precedent


The Chevron doctrine, established 40 years ago, mandated that courts defer to federal agencies in interpreting unclear laws passed by Congress. This two-part test involved:


  1. Checking if Congress had clearly addressed the issue.

  2. If not, determining if the agency’s interpretation was reasonable.


Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the majority, criticized the doctrine for forcing judges to favor the government’s interpretation over the best reading of the law. He argued that it tilted the scales of justice in favor of the federal government, undermining fair adjudication.


Implications for Freight Carriers


The Supreme Court’s decision potentially reshapes the regulatory landscape for freight carriers. Policies affecting all modes of freight transportation, including operations, climate, and labor, may now face heightened scrutiny at the agency level before implementation to withstand legal challenges.


The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA), representing small-business trucking companies, is currently assessing the potential impacts. They anticipate significant ramifications on federal regulations affecting the trucking industry.


Industry Reactions

Ken Nahigian, co-founder of the Balancing Act Project, views the decision as a positive change for regulated industries, providing them a stronger voice to challenge regulators. This could be crucial for industries facing rulemakings without clear Congressional authorization, such as certain truck size bans or unattainable fuel economy standards set by the EPA.


However, the decision also raises concerns about a potential surge in litigation, which could overwhelm the courts. The Biden administration warned of a "convulsive shock" to the legal system, predicting a flood of lawsuits as litigants challenge existing agency actions based on vague Congressional delegations of authority.


Broader Impact

The American Road and Transportation Builders Association noted that while Chevron deference had both benefits and drawbacks, its removal would require agencies to exercise greater caution in policy development. This ensures regulations can withstand legal scrutiny.

Mark Ruge, an attorney with K&L Gates and counsel to the American Maritime Partnership, highlighted the potential vulnerability of existing agency actions that relied on vague statutory delegations. He emphasized that the decision would impact the entire policy lifecycle, from bill-writing to judicial interpretations.


Conclusion


The Supreme Court's ruling marks a significant shift in the balance of power between federal regulators and the industries they oversee. Freight carriers and other regulated sectors now have a stronger foundation to challenge regulatory decisions, potentially leading to more rigorous scrutiny of agency actions and greater accountability. However, this newfound empowerment could come with the cost of increased litigation, testing the resilience of the legal system in the years to come.


1 view0 comments

Comments


bottom of page